Groupon Shares Up 1.5% on Ticket Monster Rumors

Snapdeals in 5,000 Cities and Towns in India

Foxtrot Opens Physical Location

CISPA Continues To Draw Opposition

cyber threatsCyber threats are real and have affected major corporations. China-based hackers have even tapped into personal information from journalists at the New York Times, Washington Post and Wall Street Journal. Action needs to be taken to prevent future cyber attacks.

That’s what the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act set out to achieve. In April, 2012 the bill was introduced and passed the House, but it didn’t pass the Senate because it didn’t have White House support.

In a Statement of Administration Policy from the Executive Office of the President in April, the government said in response to the bill, “Legislation should address core critical infrastructure vulnerabilities without sacrificing the fundamental values of privacy and civil liberties for out citizens.”

At that time, President Obama said he would veto the bill on the grounds that it put “American’s privacy at risk,” but it is unclear how this round with the bill will go.

Meanwhile, opponents of CISPA are making their voices heard. Fight for the Future, a digital rights group, started an anti-CISPA petition and collected 30,000 signatures in just three days. Twitter was flooded with comments that encouraged others to fight CISPA and demand privacy rights. Likewise, discussions surrounded frustration over fighting the same bill repeatedly, as well as the need for reform.

If CISPA is passed, it would amend the National Security Act of 1947 to include cyber threat intelligence and the ability to share information deemed related to such threats. Though tech-based companies and the technology industry support the bill and see it as a way to easily share data surrounding a potential threat with the government and other corporations, others oppose it because it is a violation of the fourth amendment, which applies to technology searches.

The bill may aim to protect against hackers, but it holds the possibilities of abuse. It would allow companies to easily share information of innocent people, as well as sharing unnecessary data. Some view it as a way for the government to gain more control at the cost of giving up the right to privacy.

Source: Washington Post

Tracy Rose

Tracy Rose is a staff writer at Mogul Media, contributing to Daily Deal Media and Digital MI, among other sites. Her published articles appear on a variety of websites, including Natural News, Plural Magazine, Suite 101, DECORative, Viewpoints and The Athletic Build, just to name a few. When she's not buried in research or pounding away at the keyboard, she enjoys powerlifting. Tracy is a Michigan state-record holder in deadlifting, having consecutively set records over the past three years. She can be reached at
DDM Reports
The 2014 Edition of the DDM Daily Deal Publisher Directory is the most comprehensive contact list for daily deal sites, flash retailers, aggregators and individuals operating in the daily deal industry. Each record includes the following: - Company Name - Website - Contact Name - Contact Title - Email - Phone - Address (not all records contain a full mailing address)
The 2013 Media List is a comprehensive database of all major media, bloggers and product/app review websites. If you're looking for PR distribution, this is a great list to begin with. Each record includes: - Contact Name - Publication Name - Website URL - Address - Email - Description
2.7M Consumer Subscribers. This data has been aggregated from a number of websites, which include daily deal sites that have gone out of business. Data includes: - Full Name - Address - Phone Number - Email - Signup Website - IP Address - Date of Signup Data will be delivered via a dropbox link in CSV format.